Donald Trump has turned to the US Supreme Court to defend his tariff program. He wants the justices to overturn a ruling that struck down his broad trade duties as illegal.
Presidential authority in question
The administration filed its petition on Wednesday night. It urges the court to decide quickly whether a president can impose tariffs without Congress. Last week, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 7-4 against Trump. Judges said only Congress holds the authority to set import duties.
Billions at risk
The case could derail Trump’s trade and foreign policy agenda. It may also force the US to refund billions in collected tariffs. Trump defended his actions under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. The law allows presidential action against “unusual and extraordinary” threats. In April, he declared an economic emergency, claiming trade imbalances harmed US manufacturing and threatened national security.
Ruling delayed for appeal
Although the appeals court rejected Trump’s tariffs, it postponed enforcement to allow time for an appeal. “The stakes in this case could not be higher,” Solicitor General John Sauer wrote in Wednesday’s filing. He said the ruling disrupted key trade negotiations and created legal uncertainty. He warned it weakened the president’s ability to prevent an economic and foreign policy crisis.
Small businesses challenge the tariffs
The lawsuits were filed by small firms that say the tariffs threaten their survival. Their lawyers expressed confidence. “These unlawful duties are harming small businesses,” said Jeffrey Schwab of the Liberty Justice Center. “We hope for a swift resolution for our clients.” If the Supreme Court rejects review, the ruling takes effect on October 14.
Previous court defeats
In May, the Court of International Trade in New York also ruled the tariffs unlawful. That judgment was paused during appeals. The lawsuits were filed by small firms and a coalition of states. In April, Trump signed executive orders imposing a 10 percent base tariff and “reciprocal” tariffs on more than 90 countries.
Global consequences
The appeals court also struck down tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China. Trump argued they were necessary to block drug imports. Other duties, such as those on steel and aluminum, remain in effect. They rely on a separate presidential authority.
